Source authority
Ask questions where several plausible records exist. The system should use the designated authority and explain why supporting sources did not override it.
Acceptance standard
The Business Brain assurance test checks whether the system remains useful and controlled when sources are stale, roles differ, records conflict, or an action fails.
Write the test cases before launch and repeat them after important source, model, policy, or integration changes.
Ask questions where several plausible records exist. The system should use the designated authority and explain why supporting sources did not override it.
Open each citation and verify that the source directly supports the claim, belongs to the correct client or entity, and preserves the necessary context.
Repeat the same question as different roles. Restricted evidence must never reach the answer, citation, action payload, or audit view available to that person.
Use stale and recently changed records. The system should show dates, apply review rules, and avoid presenting expired material as current.
Create contradictory approved records and incomplete evidence. The safe result is a visible conflict or limitation, not a confident compromise.
Verify who can approve, what exact change is attempted, how failure is handled, and whether the complete route can be reconstructed afterward.
The result is correct, evidence is direct, access is appropriate, and the intended action completes under the agreed control.
The answer may be useful, but uncertainty, source quality, permission, or workflow behavior needs a named resolution.
The result is unsupported, exposes restricted data, hides a conflict, bypasses approval, or leaves the business unable to reconstruct the outcome.
Readiness assessment
Score your sources, access rules, decision process, and workflow readiness. You will get a practical recommendation, not a generic maturity grade.
Assess your business